3.6 Conclusion

Social science research methods help us understand a great deal about society and human experiences. If we return to Matthew Desmond’s research on housing and evictions, we see how understanding those experiences allowed Desmond to make sound conclusions about housing in Milwaukee. Desmond outlines some of the key findings related to policy that impact families with evictions here: Unstable Housing: Matthew Desmond [YouTube Video]. In 2017, Desmond founded the Eviction Lab, which is a project to collect national data on eviction as a means to address questions about residential instability, forced moves, and poverty in America (Eviction Lab [website]). Desmond’s findings led him to advocate for a universal housing voucher. What do you think? Is housing a right? What would change if we understood housing as something everyone should have access to?

3.6.1 Review of Learning Objectives

In this chapter, you learn the many ways sociologists “do” sociology. Social science research draws on the scientific method and is important to the discipline. Along with the scientific method, sociologists must determine what research method is appropriate to use when assessing social life. We must consider the validity and reliability of our findings. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to research help us answer different types of questions; quantitative methods uses statistical analysis to quantify and measure social phenomena and qualitative methods seeks to understand the experiences of individuals or groups from their perspective by focusing on observable material such as texts, fieldnotes, photographs and interview transcripts. There are strengths and limitations to every approach we’ve discussed in this chapter. Finally, we reviewed a few key cases that help us understand the significance of ethics when it comes to designing and conducting research projects. The next chapter will explore practices of socialization and social interaction.

 

3.6.2 Additional Resources

  1. Evicted [Website]
  2. Eviction Lab [Website]

 

3.6.3 Key Terms

Anti-positivism: theoretical stance that proposes that the social realm cannot be studied with the methods of investigation utilized within the natural sciences, and that investigation of the social realm requires a different approach.

Causation: a change in one variable that directly has an effect on or causes another variable

Code of ethics: formal guidelines for conducting sociological research—consisting of principles and ethical standards to be used in the discipline.

Content analysis: systematic analysis of forms of communication to identify and study patterns and themes.

Correlation: broad term describing how a change in one variable is associated with a similar pattern of variation in another variable across cases in a data set. Correlations imply a relationship between two or more variables but do not suggest causation

Critical sociology: focuses on deconstruction of existing sociological research and theory. Critical sociologists view theories, methods, and the conclusions as serving one of two purposes: they can either legitimize and rationalize systems of social power and oppression or liberate humans from inequality and restriction on human freedom.

Ethnography: a qualitative research method in which a researcher observes a social setting to provide descriptions of a group, society, or organization.

Experiment: refers to a procedure typically used to confirm the validity of a hypothesis by comparing the outcomes of one or more experimental groups to a control group on a given measure

Generalizability: extent to which findings from a study can be applied to a larger population or different circumstance

Hypothesis: an explanation for a phenomenon based on a conjecture about the relationship between the phenomenon and one or more causal factors.

Induction: use specific observations or evidence to arrive at broad conclusions.

Interpretive framework: an approach that involves detailed understanding of a particular subject through observation, not through hypothesis testing. Interpretive frameworks allow researchers to have reflexivity so they can describe how their own social position influences what they research.

Interviews: one on one conversations with participants designed to gather information about a particular topic

Population: people who are the focus of a study

Positivism: Comte’s theory which suggests that science produces universal laws, science controls what is true, and that objective methods allow you to pursue that truth. Refer to chapter 2

Qualitative methods: tends to work with non-numerical data and attempts to understand the experiences of individuals and groups from their own perspectives. With qualitative approaches, researchers examine how groups participate in their own meaning making and development of culture.

Quantitative methods: research that uses numerical data; the social world and experiences are translated into numbers that can be examined mathematically through statistical analysis.

Random sample -every person in a population has the same chance of being chosen for the study.

Reflexivity- ability of the researcher to examine how their own social position influences how and what they research. Reflexivity requires the researcher to evaluate how their own feelings, reactions and motives influence how they think and behave in a situation.

Reliability: how likely research results are to be replicated if the study is reproduced

Sample: a manageable number of subjects who represent a larger population. The success of a study depends on how well a population is represented by the sample.

Survey: collects data from subjects who respond to a series of questions about behaviors and opinions, often in the form of a questionnaire or an interview. Surveys are one of the most widely used scientific research methods.

Validity: how well the study measures what it was designed to measure

3.6.4 Discussion Questions

  1. What types of questions are best answered with survey questions? What additional information might you gather by using qualitative interviews?
  2. What are some important skills for a qualitative researcher to have?
  3. In this chapter you learned about community-based participatory research. Learn more by listening to this talk from Dr. Blake Poland at University of Toronto Public Health Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) [YouTube Video] Questions to consider while watching:
    1. What is community-based participatory research?
    2. How are research projects designed? What is different about this approach compared to traditional approaches to research?
    3. What are some of the skills needed to conduct this type of research?
    4. How might you use this type of research outside of the area of public health?
  4. Create a brief research design about a topic in which you are passionately interested. Now write a letter to a philanthropic or grant organization requesting funding for your study. How can you describe the project in a convincing yet realistic and objective way? Explain how the results of your study will be a relevant contribution to the body of sociological work already in existence.
  5. Why do you think the American Sociological Association (ASA) crafted such a detailed set of ethical principles? What type of study could put human participants at risk? Think of some examples of studies that might be harmful. Do you think that, in the name of sociology, some researchers might be tempted to cross boundaries that threaten human rights? Why?
  6. Would you willingly participate in a sociological study that could potentially put your health and safety at risk, but had the potential to help thousands or even hundreds of thousands of people? For example, would you participate in a study of a new drug that could cure diabetes or cancer, even if it meant great inconvenience and physical discomfort for you or possible permanent damage?

 

3.6.5 Licenses and Attributions for Conclusion

“Conclusion” by Jennifer Puentes is licensed under CC BY 4.0

 

3.6.6 Chapter Bibliography

Adler, Patricia A., and Peter Adler. 1987. Membership roles in field research. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications.

Anon. n.d. “Engineer Became Highest Ranking Native American in Union Army.” Www.Army.Mil. Retrieved April 22, 2022 (https://www.army.mil/article/252126/engineer_became_highest_ranking_native_american_in_union_army).

Anon. n.d. “International Research.” Retrieved April 23, 2022 (https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/guidance-for-applicants/research-ethics-guidance/international-research/).

Anon. n.d. “‘Producing “Indigenous Knowledge” through “Fieldwork:” The Proliferation of Field-Scientific Knowledge through the Global Conservation Movement’ | CISSR | The University of Chicago.” Retrieved April 22, 2022 (https://cissr.uchicago.edu/research/2020-2021/field-research/jiyea-hong).

Anon. n.d. “Statement on Anthropology, Colonialism, and Racism | Department of Anthropology.” Retrieved April 22, 2022 (https://anthropology.sas.upenn.edu/news/2021/04/28/statement-anthropology-colonialism-and-racism).

Adler, PA and Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Best, Joel. 2008. Stat-spotting: a field guide to identifying dubious data. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Boas, Franz (1888), “The Central Eskimo”, Smithsonian Institution via Gutenberg, Sixth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1884–1885, Government Printing Office, Washington, pp. 399–670, retrieved 13 January 2015

Chapin, Mac, Zachary Lamb, and Bill Threlkeld. 2005. “MAPPING INDIGENOUS LANDS.” Annual Review of Anthropology 34(1):619–38. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120429.

Charmaz, Kathy. 2009. “Grounded Theory.” The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. 2003. SAGE Publications. 24 May. 2009.

Creswell, John, and Clark, Vicki Plano. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar

 

Greene, Jennifer. 2008. Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Hesse-Biber, Sharlene. 2010. Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar

Hesse-Biber, Sharlene and Burke, R. Johnson. 2015. Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cruden, G., Campbell, M., & Saldana, L. 2021. Impact of COVID-19 on service delivery for an evidence-based behavioral treatment for families involved in the child welfare system. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 129, Article 108388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108388

Datta, R. (2018). Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research. Research Ethics, 14(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117733296

Desmond, Matthew. 2016. Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City. New York: Crown.

Devon A. Mihesuah, ed., Natives and Academics: Researching and Writing about American Indians (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1998)

Druckman D, Donohue W. Innovations in Social Science Methodologies: An Overview. American Behavioral Scientist. 2020;64(1):3-18. doi:10.1177/0002764219859623. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0002764219859623

Edward Said, “Representing the Colonized: Anthropology’s Interlocutors,” Critical Inquiry 15, no. 2 (1989): 205-25.

Ellis, Carolyn. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press

Jörg Friedrichs (2021) Majority-Muslim Hate Crimes in England: An Interpretive Quantitative Analysis, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 41:2, 215-232, DOI: 10.1080/13602004.2021.1947587

Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research.

Hill, Michael R. 1991. “Harriet Martineau (1802-1876) .” Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. (387).

Kim, Hwansuk. 2019. “Decolonization and the Ontological Turn of Sociology.” Journal of Asian Sociology, Institute for Social Development and Policy Research (ISDPR) 48 : 443–54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26868270.(4).

Kuhn, Casey. 2021. ” ‘Fire as Medicine’: How Indigenous Practices Could Help Curb Wildfires.” Accessed September 4, 2022. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/fire-is-medicine-how-indigenous-practices-could-help-curb-wildfires

Lassiter, L., 2005. The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Loseke, Donileen R. 2017. Methodological Thinking: Basic Principles of Social Research Design. 2nd Edition. SAGE Publications

Maréchal, Garance. (2010). Autoethnography. In Albert J. Mills, Gabrielle Durepos & Elden Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (Vol. 2, pp. 43-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Mihesuah and Angela Cavender Wilson, eds., Indigenizing the Academy: Transforming Scholarship and Empowering Communities (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004).

Morgan 1901. League of the Ho-de-no sau-nee, or Iroquois. New York: Dodd, Meade and Company

Partners In Health, 2009. Paul Farmer: I believe in health care as a human right..

Available at: <https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/applying-the-lessons-of-ebola-to-the-fight-against-covid-19#transcript> [Accessed 15 March 2022].

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. 2005. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.

Saldana, L. 2016. Addressing the needs of families referred for neglect: The FAIR efficacy trial. https://www.oslc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/FAIRFinalReport.pdf

Saldana, L., Smith, D., & Weber, E. (2013). Adolescent onset of maternal substance abuse: Descriptive findings from a feasibility trial. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 22, 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/1067828X.2013.788885

Saldana, L. 2015. An integrated intervention to address the comorbid needs of families referred to child welfare for substance use disorders and child neglect: FAIR Pilot Outcomes. Child Welfare, 94(5e), 167–186. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26827470

Saldana, L. 2016. Addressing the needs of families referred for neglect: The FAIR efficacy trial. https://www.oslc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/FAIRFinalReport.pdf

Schutt, Russell K. 2017. Understanding the social world: research methods for the 21st century. Los Angeles: SAGE publications.

Seligmann, L. and Estes, B., 2019. Innovations in Ethnographic Methods. American Behavioral Scientist, [online] 64(2), pp.176-197. Available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335718882_Innovations_in_Ethnographic_Methods> [Accessed 15 March 2022]. DOI:10.1177/0002764219859640

Sonnenfeld, J. A. 1985. “Shedding light on the Hawthorne Studies.” Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 6(2): 111–130.

Smith, Dorothy E. 1990. The conceptual practices of power: a feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

Stringer, Ernest T. 2007. Action research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Moskovitz, Cary, and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 2017. Writing in Sociology: A Brief Guide. Oxford University Press.

Truong , Nicolas, and Nicolas Weill. 2012. “A Decade after His Death, French Sociologist Pierre Bourdieu Stands Tall.” The Guardian, February 21.

Tuhiwai Smith, Linda. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples . London and NY: Zed books.

Vine Deloria, Jr., Custer Died for Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto (New York: MacMillan, 1969), 78-100

Weiss, Robert Stuart. 1994. Learning from strangers: the art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.

White, Leslie A. (1951). “Lewis H. Morgan’s Western Field Trips” (PDF). American Anthropologist. 53: 11–18. doi:10.1525/aa.1951.53.1.02a00030.

License

Sociology in Everyday Life Copyright © by Matt Gougherty and Jennifer Puentes. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book