4.9 Conclusion

In this chapter, we examined the theories that emphasize inequitable social structure as the primary cause of crime. From the sociological perspective, crime doesn’t come from within but rather comes from the neighborhoods, communities, policies, and people. Sociological theories on crime can help to produce policies that focus on changing the social structure and supporting the creation of community centers, community grants, educational improvement, and business loans. However, some of these resources are not available in all areas. For crime to decrease, according to sociologists, there needs to be a focus on the social structure and on providing resources for everyone, not just those who are privileged.

4.9.1 Application Exercises

  1. Scroll through your own social media. How many advertisements are there in your feed that promote messages of materialism or things you must have to be fulfilled? How can these types of messages contribute to strain and frustration?
  2. Explore the Defund the Police movement that is based on the ideas represented in these theories. Read more about it here and discuss connections between the movement’s key points and the theories in this chapter.
  3. Design (or describe) the type of society that would be free of crime. What would it take, according to the theories in this chapter, for society to be completely crime-free and safe? Explain each factor and why it is important to the success of this design.

4.9.2 Discussion Questions

  1. Eleanor Roosevelt said, “When will our consciences grow so tender that we will act to prevent human misery rather than avenge it?” How does this quote relate to the theories you read in this chapter?
  2. What part do you think economic conflict plays in crime rates in our society? As stated earlier, when financial times are good, crime usually goes down. Our economy is in a decline, so can creating a more equal society actually help to reduce crime rates?
  3. What challenges do historically marginalized groups and/or members of lower social classes face in being able to achieve the American Dream?
  4. How would one argue a criminal is only criminal because the opportunity to commit a crime exists?
  5. How could subcultures be judged unjustly in the criminal justice system since they are being judged by the standards of the dominant culture?
  6. How might someone argue people become criminals because of the society they grow up in and the people they interact with?
  7. Why don’t some people commit crime when others do?

4.9.3 Key Terms

  • anomie
  • conflict theory
  • containment theory
  • control-balance theory
  • differential association theory
  • differential opportunity theory
  • general strain theory
  • general theory of crime
  • interactionist theories
  • labeling theory
  • power control theory
  • routine activities theory
  • social bond theory
  • social learning theory
  • social disorganization theory
  • status frustration theory
  • strain theory
  • structural functionalism
  • subculture of violence theory
  • theory of imitation

4.9.4 Summary

In this chapter, we looked at sociological theories of crime. Early theories include anomie which addresses how individualism and not connecting with social norms or rules can lead to deviance. The theory of imitation explains how crime can be the result of imitation or modeling the behaviors of others. Social structure theories see that the existence of a social structure provides a continuous benefit to society, but a weakened system results in social issues. Conflicts between social groups can also lead to crime. The distance between what someone wants to achieve and what they are actually able to achieve because of various obstacles and limitations is strain. Strain theory claims that when someone faces strain, they experience anomie which leads to the relative absence or confusion of norms and rules in society. When applied to strain theory, anomie is the willingness to take alternative routes or use alternative means to get to the goals you want. Social disorganization theory claims that neighborhoods with weak community controls caused by poverty, residential mobility, and ethnic heterogeneity will experience a higher level of criminal and delinquent behavior. In general strain theory, social injustice or inequality may be at the root of strain and can lead an individual to criminal or delinquent behavior.

Status frustration theory argues that four factors—social class, school performance, status frustration, and reaction formation (coping methods)—contribute to the development of delinquency in juveniles. The focus of differential opportunity theory is on the discrepancy between what the lower-class juveniles desire and what means are available to them because they have fewer opportunities than their peers in other neighborhoods. Routine activities theory sees crime as a function of people’s everyday behavior. Differential association theory asserts that criminality is learned through a process of interactions with others who communicate criminal values and who advocate the commission of crimes.

In labeling theory, someone only becomes deviant once that label is applied. Social learning theory asserts that people learn attitudes and behaviors conducive to crime from positive reinforcement (rewards) and negative reinforcement (punishments). The notion of social control relates to formal or informal relationships that keep people within certain bounds of what is socially acceptable because they do not want to harm those relationships. Containment theory states that crime is the consequence of social pressures to involve oneself in violations of the law, as well as a failure to resist such pressures.

In social bond theory, through successful socialization, a bond forms between individuals and the social group that limits criminal behavior. General theory of crime looks at the connection between self-control and crime. Control-balance theory focuses on the control someone is under and the control they hold themselves.

4.9.5 Resources

4.9.6 Licenses and Attributions for Conclusion

“Conclusion” by Curt Sobolewski is licensed under CC BY 4.0.

License

 Introduction to Criminology Copyright © by Taryn VanderPyl. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book