13.5 Human Interference with Shorelines

There are various modifications that we make in an attempt to influence shoreline processes for our own purposes. Sometimes these changes are effective, and may appear to be beneficial, although in most cases there are unintended negative consequences that we don’t recognize until much later.

An example is at the beach near Comox (described above), which has been armored with rip-rap and concrete blocks in an attempt to limit the natural erosion that is threatening the properties at the top of the cliff (Figure 13.31). As already noted, the unintended effect of this installation will be to starve Goose Spit of sediment. As long as the armor remains in place, which might be several decades, there is a significant risk that the spit will start to erode, which will affect many of the organisms that use that area as their habitat, and many of the people who go there for recreation.

Figure 13.31 The seawall at Stanley Park, Vancouver.

Seawalls, like the one around Vancouver’s Stanley Park (Figure 13.31), also help to limit erosion and can be very pleasant amenities for the public, but they have geological and ecological costs. When a shoreline is “hardened” in this way, important marine habitat is lost and sediment production is reduced, and that can affect beaches elsewhere. Seawalls also affect the behavior of waves and longshore currents, sometimes with negative results.

Breakwaters have led to an accumulation of sediment to form Sunset Beach
Figure 13.32 Map of the impact of breakwaters (or groins) on beach formation at Sunset Beach, Vancouver.

Another example is at Sunset Beach in Vancouver. As shown in Figure 13.32, a series of rip-rap breakwaters (structures parallel to the shore) were built in the 1990s and sand has accumulated behind them to form the beach. The breakwaters have acted as islands and the sand has been deposited in the low-energy water behind them, in the same way that a tombolo forms. This can be seen from a photograph taken from the Burrard Bridge in 2015 (Figure 13.33). The two benefits of this project are that a pleasant beach has been created, and some of the sediment that previously would have been moved into False Creek, and could have blocked its entrance, has been trapped in English Bay. The negative impacts are probably not well understood, but have likely involved loss of marine animal habitat.

Figure 13.33 Photograph of the impact of breakwaters on beach development at Sunset Beach, Vancouver.

Groynes (or groins in the U.S.) have an effect that is similar to that of breakwaters, although groin are constructed perpendicular to the beach (Figure 13.34), and they trap sediment by slowing the longshore current.

Figure 13.34 A groin at Crescent Beach, Surrey, B.C.

Most of the sediment that forms beaches along our coasts comes from rivers, so if we want to take care of beaches, we have to take care of rivers. When a river is dammed, its sediment load is deposited in the resulting reservoir, and for the century or two while the reservoir is filling up, that sediment cannot get to the sea. During that time, beaches (including spits, baymouth bars, and tombolos) within tens of kilometers of the river’s mouth (or more in some cases) are at risk of erosion.

Exercise 13.5 Crescent beach groins

This diagram shows the same area illustrated in Figure 13.34 at Crescent Beach in Surrey, B.C. Based on information that you can find on the Internet about the function of groynes, determine which way the prevailing longshore current is moving at this location.

Figure 13.35 Beach and groin locations at Crescent Beach, Surrey.


Media Attributions



Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

13.5 Human Interference with Shorelines Copyright © 2021 by Katharine Solada and K. Sean Daniels is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book